MY COMMUNISM IS NOT COMMON BUT RATHER LOGIC. AND WHEN YOU ARE COMMUNIST LOGIC IS PRIMORDIAL.
I THINK THE FRENCH ARMY SHOULD NOT HAVE TRY TO FIGHT AGAINST THE GERMAN ARMY, EVEN SOFTLY AS IT DID, IN 1940.
DE GAULLE DID NOT WANT TO SPEAK WITH NAZIS, CONTRARY TO FRENCH WRITER L.F. CELINE, FOR EXAMPLE. BUT WAS DE GAULLE REALLY FRENCH? I DO NOT THINK SO. TOO UGLY TO BE. ALONG HIS SHORT CAREER OF POLITICIAN, HE ALWAYS EXCITED THE HATE OF PEOPLE AGAINST HIM. PETAIN ALTHOUGH WAS APPRECIATED BY SIMPLE SOLDIERS BECAUSE HE SAVED A LOT OF LIFES AS TRUE HISTORIANS KNOW IT.
SO WE WOULD HAVE SAVED A LOT OF HUMAN LIFES FROM EVERY RELIGION OR COLOUR!
AND THE NAZISM? THIS SLAVERY WHICH IS SUPPOSED TO MAKE YOU FREE AS CHINESE STILL SEEM TO THINK TODAY!? HOW TO GET RID OF IT?
ON THIS POINT FRENCH COMMUNISTS MAY BE HAD NOT ENOUGH CONFIDENCE IN COMMUNISM. CHRISTIANISM, FOR EXAMPLE, WON AGAINST THE ROMAN RELIGION JUST BECAUSE THE OLD RELIGION WAS STILL OVER. LOGIC DOES NOT NEED THE HELP OF WEAPONS TO WIN.
IF IT IS POSSIBLE TO SPEAK ABOUT HITLER NOT AS A MONSTER IN A HOLLYWOOD BLOCKBUSTER (IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO DO IT IN FRANCE IN PUBLIC), ONE CAN SAY HE WAS NOT HIMSELF ENTIRELY CONVINCED BY THE SCULPTURES OF ARNO BRECKER AND THE BIG SQUARE BLOCKS OF ARCHITECT ALBERT SPEER WHOSE IDEA ON ARCHITECTURE IS STILL ALIVE. HE WAS AWARE THAT THERE IS NO BIG DIFFERENCE BETWEEN HIS BLOCKHAUS, THE 'BAUHAUS' OF KANDINSKY AND KLEE (AND THE 'TWIN TOWERS').
HE EVEN NOTICED THE LIKENESS BETWEEN APOSTLE SAINT PAUL AND KARL MARX. THAT PROVES THAT HITLER WAS NOT AS STUPID AS IN BLOCKBUSTERS.
I GUESS THAT HITLER AT LEAST WOULD HAVE MOVE TO COMMUNISM AS CONSTANTIN EMPEROR DID.
HUMANITY STILL CROSSED BAD PERIODS OF INTENSE STUPIDITY AS WE ARE CROSSING NOW FOR AND THE TRIUMPH OF DABBLERS IN SCIENCE SUCH AS DARWIN, GAUSS, HELMHOLTZ, RIEMANN, KANDINSKY, MALEVITCH, FREUD, KANT... BUT LOGIC AT THE END WINS.