Voltaire ou Rousseau ?

Avec le gaullisme, c'est l'idéologie politique de Charles Maurras qui triomphe paradoxalement en 1958 ; paradoxalement, car l'infamie attachée à son nom, depuis la sentence de trahison en janvier 1945 contre lui, n'a pas empêché l'antiparlementarisme, au coeur de sa doctrine, de s'imposer par l'intermédiaire du général de Gaulle (et le soutien du parti communiste !).

Annihiler le parlement pour restaurer l'aura et l'efficacité du pouvoir monarchique est incontestablement un projet maurrassien. Il faut parler d'idéologie ou de doctrine à propos de Maurras, car son système politique ne s'appuie pas sur des connaissances historiques sérieuses. Ainsi le catholicisme a joué un rôle centralisateur puissant (Henri de Navarre ne s'est pas converti pour rien au catholicisme), que Maurras ignore absolument, lui préférant des thèses à la limite du complotisme.

Marxist be careful!

Thinking that Hitler and nazism are no ordinary liberalism is the last mistake that marxist people must do. The demonstration that Hitler is one Devil who fell down from the sky is the main argument of publicists, journalists, teachers and the army of liberalism... which mostly do not even believe in God! Everything but History.

History contrarily teaches that A. Hitler made the most honest liberal politics of XXth century and that this is this honesty that made German nazis adventure shorter, as French Revolution of 1789.

Antisemitism was just useless for Napoleon before Hitler, who did not even need to seduce French people and win the general election as Hitler did. Antisemitism is just nazi's style, the orchestra of his "Titanic".

FRENCH ATTACKS

THANKS TO INTERNET I FOUND AND COULD GET ONE SAMPLE OF AN OLD BOOK WRITTEN BY ONE OF MY ANCESTOR IN 1795. HIS AIM IS TO GIVE ADVISES TO FUTURE GENERATIONS. IT IS NOT SURPRISING THAT HE DID NOT LET HIS NAME IN POLITICAL IDEAS HISTORY BECAUSE HIS FIRST IDEA WAS TO BUILD A MARBLE TEMPLE TO GOD IN HIS PARK.

WHAT MAKES HIM SYMPATHIC ALTHOUGH I DO NOT HAVE A LOT OF REASONS TO ADMIRE MY ANCESTRY IN GENERAL (LOTS OF 'GENTLEMEN' OF THE ROBE), IT IS HIS PHILOSOPHY: ALTHOUGH HE LOST EVERYTHING BECAUSE OF THE REVOLUTION HE IS HAPPY TO BE ALIVE, HE AND HIS FAMILY. THE LESSON IS FOR HIM THAT ONE DO NOT OWNS ANYTHING REALLY IN THIS LOW WORLD. HE STILL INTENDS TO PUT HIS NEXT SAVINGS IN AN EX-VOTO (NEO-CLASSIC STYLE I GUESS).

MY ANCESTOR WAS NOT THE ONLY GUY TO BE LIKE THAT AT THIS TIME, FULL OF OPTIMISM, NO REVENGE WILLING. I AM SURE THAT IT IS THE REASON WHY HIS LINEAGE MADE HIM A BAD REPUTATION DURING THE XIXth, ACCUSING HIM TO HAVE SPEND A LOT OF MONEY WITH GIRLS BEFORE BEING ENTIRELY RIFLED.

BANKRUPTCY IS THE ONLY UNFORGIVABLE CRIME FOR THE 'BOURGEOIS' THAT TOOK THE PLACE OF THE ARISTOCRAT.