Protestantism... of Satan?

 

 

Protestantism is for some Sociologists the Matrix of Capitalism; obviously they did not read German Luther, Dutch Erasmus or English Francis Bacon. Condemning Speculation M. Luther is not different from Catholic Dante Alighieri; that makes today Catholic Pope more 'Protestant' -in the sociologist idea- than Luther himself!

This problem allows to understand two points:

-First one is that Marxism is opposite to Sociology;

-Second one is that Sociology is not a Science but a Religion;

*

- Marxist History against Sociology, because Protestantism is the consequence of Capitalism, not its Inspiration or Cause. As a result, there is no big difference between Protestantism and Roman catholicism today. Divisions are coming from Politics and the Hypocrisy of the clerks is to deny it.

Did Luther intended to make the religion of German bankers, insurance Officers, Auditors or Lawyers? Of course not, though he committed the big mistake to ask for the help of some Prince.

Good question is: what is so useful for Politicians and Bankers in Protestantism that made this religion puted on by rich nations after they defeated Catholic Church? First thing, easy to understand, is that Protestantism is based on Ethics and is an 'out of History' Christianity. Puritanism was the door opened to the State religion which became the most common religion though Christian people cannot serve two Masters. Capitalist gangsters have so 'Ethics' in their mouth as kids have chewing-gums in their.

Therefore Protestantism is, as French Jansenism does, the coming back to old Soul System which is the best for one dictatorship. That is why French Moliere made of Jansenism, this Christian free-masonic idea the Devil's religion with deep understanding that tells me he probably read Shakespeare. Human Pyramid -as a goal of every kind of Theocracy or fiendish Politics, dictatorship can be made if only you are changing people in souls, that is to say little cells.

*

- Sociology is a religion then, because it is taking Capitalism as a Necessary turn of History (exactly as Theory of History in the nazism of G.W.F Hegel does). 'Capitalism is because it had to be'. This is not History but Mathematics. To make the link with Satan here: this kind of explanation (latin explanation because it is the 'mutatis mutandis' explanation) was qualified by Marx as a Philosophical or Esoteric one. Sociology has grown up on Nazism, not on Marxist History.

Therefore Sociology seems to be entirely made for hiding this truth that Capitalist Economy is a static one and that "the stronger central Poweis, the stronger capitalism is too", along capitalist History. Greek Nation is going bankrupt as a regular Bank, asking the help of other Bankers after themselves asked the help of some States a few month before. Economy is not really teached in Business Schools but a kind of Religion. But most important is that common people must not understand the Game.

*Portrait is of Joseph de Maistre by Valotton, example of a Christian typical free-mason not far away from German Leibniz or English Isaac Newton, G.W.F. Hegel, this kind of Christianity that is the Matrix of nazism, devotion for Politics checking the truth that one cannot serve two Masters at the same Time.

Rafle en Rafale

 

 

 

Tir groupé de compassion dans les médiats en faveur des déportés du Vel-d'Hiv. La compassion vis-à-vis des Juifs persécutés fait depuis quelques années partie de la morale officielle, à côté de la compassion pour les Beurs et les Blacks, un peu en perte de vitesse ces derniers temps compte tenu de leur plus faible poids dans les urnes. On ne sait trop des macchabées juifs ou du haschisch-prolétariat parqué en banlieue dans des ensembles résidentiels post-modernes qui est le mieux placé pour se féliciter du progrès offert par une telle religion ?

Quoi qu'il en soit, on constate qu'en matière de propagande, le cinéma possède un net avantage sur la littérature ordinaire. Non seulement il n'est pas nécessaire que les masses sachent déchiffrer autre chose que des tickets de caisse, des bulletins de vote ou des romans-photo, mais le cinéma a pour effet d'entretenir l'incapacité du public à lire des bouquins sérieux -d'histoire par exemple.

Allez donc voir "La Raflle", braves gens, et ressortez-en édifiés sur l'habileté des industriels et des banquiers à faire oublier qu'Adolf Hitler, sans eux, n'aurait jamais disposé de panzers. Ah, le beau discours de repentance de Jacques Chirac ! Il aurait cependant été préférable que les avionneurs français ne mettent pas leur savoir-faire au service de l'Allemagne nazie.

*

Le cas d'Eric Zemmour est avec celui de Dominique de Villepin un des plus grotesques exemples connus de cette propagande qui unit libéraux de droite et de gauche, justifiant Marx une fois de plus de s'intéresser aux mobiles économiques plutôt qu'aux discours de façade. Avec de tels énergumènes, l'histoire est transmutée en moraline à l'usage des abonnés du "Figaro". Le talent particulier de Zemmour est de faire passer son hypocrisie académique pour de la naïveté.

Profitant de la ferveur religieuse autour de "La Rafle", Zemmour n'hésite pas à refaire le coup de Laval = pacifiste, et donc pacifiste = irresponsable et criminel de guerre en puissance. Venant d'un baveux comme Zemmour qui bosse pour le compte d'un consortium spécialisé dans le trafic légal "d'outils de défense nationale" (Dassault dixit), on ne saurait mieux transformer l'histoire en publi-reportage.

L'idolâtrie de Napoléon, du niveau du gosse qui joue avec ses petits soldats de plomb et non de l'histoire réelle, participe du même subterfuge. Pourquoi un Iranien ne se moquerait-il pas des Juifs massacrés si un Français se moque des civils espagnols massacrés par les troupes de Napoléon Ier ?

En outre Napoléon a servi de modèle à Hegel pour écrire une doctrine prônant un Léviathan mathématique et juridique qui ressemble à s'y méprendre au IIIe Reich ultérieur, parti pour mille ans de jeux olympiques, de poésie, de cinéma et de musique boche à la con. Quelle jubilation, la guerre ! aux yeux de pédérastes comme Zemmour qui seraient probablement jugés inaptes si elle avait lieu.

*

- Drieu La Rochelle, fachiste moins niais que Zemmour, faisait observer que la durée moyenne d'une civilisation étant de mille ans, un historien qui n'a pas un recul d'au moins quelques siècles est inapte à expliquer quoi que ce soit, si ce n'est comme Darwin explique l'évolution sur des centaines de millions d'années (allons-y gaiement !), par des "mutations" qui sont à la science ce que le tour de magie est aux arts libéraux.

- Pour prouver que le pacifisme n'est pas en reste sur Zemmour et ses tours de passe-passe, citons l'exemple d'un pacifiste (dont le nom m'échappe), qui vu le manque d'efficacité de la somptuaire ligne Maginot et des branleurs composant l'Etat-major français en 1940, a proposé qu'on supprime carrément le budget des armées, pour recourir le cas échéant à un moyen qui a fait la preuve d'une plus grande efficacité à moindre coût : la résistance par le terrorisme.

- L'animatrice boche d'"Arte" de style gauchiste bcbg, dans l'émission "Paris-Berlin" exprimait récemment le regret que la guerre en Afghanistan ne soit pas menée... avec tout le sérieux nécessaire. L'adjectif "sérieux" dans la bouche de cette grosse Bertha de propagande atlantiste ne prête pas moins à sourire que dans celle de Zemmour.

Inglorious Politics

French Politicians and Press are talking and talking about the 'Caution principle' that was crated to limit the risks caused by Capitalistic Economy that has the irresponsibility principle in its heart. Same but more efficient is the US Judicial system.

This Paradox of both irresponsibility and security is essential to understand Liberalism. Of course the Money itself is made of the same contradiction, which is the Game paradox too (let's say the 'Black Jack Paradox' because I am Christian.)

This was difficult for Press and TV, Networks, to hide this irresponsability recently because of the Big Earthquake that occurred, which opened many French eyes on the Incapacity of the 'five hundred families' that do rule their country. One can may be find an explanation in the French difference in the fact that French Economy, as it is based a lot on Touring, is less dependent on big industries. French President Sarkozy, who is working for French Industrial trusts is aware of this and would like to develop French Industry... in 2010! Inglorious basterds that keep the State in their hands do dare calling this 'liberalism' and speak about liberty. Do they think people are stupid as Monkeys?

*

The 'Caution principle' is of course useless remedy, and French bankers and their journalists are joking about it. It does not change anything in the Capitalist economy; but don't be wrong, though their jokes they are the stupidest capitalists. 'Caution principle' is made to make common people believe that the State and its law is protecting them, which is an essential religion that modern soft dictatorship* cannot get rid of, especially when there is high unemployment level.

Karl Marx, joining the Christian rage against Society, already was thinking at his Time that Socialism and Sociology were the most wile in liberalism. Leftwing capitalists are smarter than conservatives, with exceptions as Margaret Thatcher in Great Britain. One can compare conservative liberalism (Bush) and social liberalism (Obama) with two Shopkeepers. First one wants 'the butter and the money of it' (French proverb); second one knows he has to waste a little peace of butter not to see his Shop broken by angry people. Second one is the best Shopkeeper.

*Soft dictatorship which is in Europa or USA allows Violence in Asia, Africa or South-America.

Vaseline capitaliste

Le désormais fameux "principe de précaution" français vise à limiter les dégâts du principe d'irresponsabilité au coeur de l'économie capitaliste centralisée. Il est l'équivalent dans notre régime républicain du (beaucoup plus efficace) système d'actions judiciaires en vigueur aux Etats-Unis.

Cette irresponsabilité, les médiats ne sont pas parvenu dernièrement à la dissimuler complètement aux profanes, vu l'amplitude du dernier séisme. L'impéritie des cinq cent familles qui dirigent la France a éclaté à la figure des Français. Question d'identité nationale, on peut penser que les Français ne sont pas la population la plus enthousiaste à se faire enculer par le genre de VRP qu'il est convenu d'appeler 'élu' ou 'représentant du peuple'.

Autant dire que le "principe de précaution" est une cautère sur une jambe de bois, qui a de quoi faire marrer les escrocs libéraux dans leurs barbes. Qu'on ne s'y trompe pas, les plus malins sont ici les inventeurs du "principe de précaution" et non leurs détracteurs. Le principe de précaution ne change rien à l'état de fait de l'économie capitaliste, dans un sens ou dans l'autre. En revanche il contribue à faire gober au plus grand nombre cette théorie selon laquelle l'Etat se préoccupe du sort des citoyens, ce qui constitue dans le type d'Etat totalitaire "mou" où nous sommes un rôle religieux essentiel (la violence est subie par les populations du tiers-monde).

Rejoignant la haine chrétienne du monde ou de la société, Karl Marx en son temps a reconnu dans le socialisme la plus grande ruse.

On peut comparer le libéral de droite et celui de gauche à deux boutiquiers. Le premier veut le beurre et l'argent du beurre ; le second sait bien qu'il vaut mieux réserver un petit pot de cette graisse pour enduire les maux des sans-grade, et mieux protéger ainsi le fonds de commerce d'éventuels mouvements de colère. La meilleure preuve en est que Sarkozy après Chirac, sans oublier ce crétin de Fillon, ont vite dû remiser leurs petits programmes "made in USA" pour militants de l'UMP dès lors qu'ils ont été confrontés à la réalité de la tactique électorale et gouvernementale.

 

Dostoïevskimania

Vu de France, Dostoïevski n'apporte rien de plus que Frédéric Nitche. Le problème de la foi est un problème de femelles allemandes auquel la France a déjà été confronté au XVIIe siècle. On peut résumer le problème ainsi : les trente-six façons d'être chrétien sont identiques aux trente-six façons de ne pas l'être. Si le christianisme était fait pour les écrivains hystériques, ça se saurait. La sainte Russie ou la sainte Allemagne, tout ça n'est plus très frais.

Me fait bien marrer de lire dans une gazette littéraire que Dostoïevski aurait tout prévu de ce qui allait arriver à la Russie. Raspoutine aussi avait tout prévu, et non seulement ça, mais il a pu menacer des pires calamités cet imposteur de Nicolas II. Sans que cela n'ait aucun effet sur l'abruti Romanov, qui pour un peu ferait passer Marie-Antoinette pour une lumière.

La seule chose qui soit chrétienne, c'est de prévenir le néant pour untel ou tel autre, pas de l'annoncer aux hommes politiques ou à la masse de leurs électeurs, non moins aveugles et dépourvus d'imagination. Cassandre n'est pas une sainte chrétienne.

Religion of Sociology

 

 

 

Sociology is for marxist people everything but a Science: a Religion. Sociologists, whose Ancestors were the Moralists of the XVIIth Century make me think about TV or Networks: a Thermometer in the Ass of Society.

Sociology as TV or religion are useless if you are not against them, trying to destroy those fiendish mirrors, what is necessary to be free.

Whereas the father of this religion is Heidegger in nazism (in fact G.W.F Hegel is ten times smarter than Heidegger -the Teacher faith against the Soldier's one.), Jean-Paul Sartre is in French nation. This allows to understand the main difference between a true Science and a fake one as Sociology, ersatz of Science. There is no distrust of the Language in a fake Science.

The Devil Inside

 

 

 

French journalist Jacques Duquesne wrote a book about the Church and the Devil, demonstrating that Catholic Church got rid of him last Century along. And in fact advertising for the Devil is more in rockn'roll Lyrics or Hollywood movies now than in Christian Churches.

This turn is for the author Duquesne a progress toward more Responsability:

- First thing to say is that the reflexion of Duquesne is out of Christian tradition or explanations though this man does like being called a 'Christian' or even a 'Papist' to sell more books. One cannot be 'Christian' and not believe what Jesus says. Religion of Duquesne is Capitalism and he worked in fact during decades for Newspapers praising capitalism, not Jesus. Responsability is starting with the fact not to mix capitalism with the Christian praise of poverty.

- Idea of a 'bigger responsability' would be funny if the sense of responsability of capitalist Politics was not illustrated by rivers of blood due to the struggle between huge States until War along last century.

*

But this Publicist is not responsible of the vanishing of the Devil in most Christian Sermons or Theology. German Christian Theology where Nazism and 'existentialism' came out enable to understand this changing. One can summarize it under the name of 'Anthropology'. This mechanic that one can find in E. Kant philosophy, S. Freud too, or in nazi Heidegger more recently does enable to change the Devil in a moral value: he becomes 'bad' principle when God is becoming 'good' principle. Understand that this anthropologic turn is as much swallowing the Devil than it is swallowing the Nature (The idiotic turn of Ecologism when Earth becomes one human's soul is included in this philosophy), a 'Nature' which is understood here as it is in the Latin Paganism as 'elements'. Greek idea of Nature that does infirm Latin idea of 'elements' brakes anthropologic reflexion and does explain why lots of Greek scientists did believe in the Devil (Apollo) as true Christian.

*

After Shakespeare or Francis Bacon who are in the Christian materialism tradition inspired by Greek Science*, one can think that Christian satanism is summarized in what it is sometimes called 'Natural law', idea which was invented by stupid middle age monks, betraying Aristotle on this point (who did not wait for A. Einstein to know that laws are submitted to relativity principle. Not even Zeno waited for German simpleton Einstein or French Poincaré.) Christian free-masons such as French J. de Maistre in XIXth are not far away from this idea of 'Natural law' too. One can especially read in French poet Baudelaire, who was following de Maistre, that he is not clearly making the difference between God and the Devil, as he is admitting frankly.

Not difficult to understand that nazism or darwinism are continuing this middle age idea of 'Natural law' too. It is Satanic principle for Christian because this is the way to change Politics in a sacred matter against the warning of Jesus not to try to make his Kingdom in this World.

*Pythagoras is closer to religion than science and therefore closer to Aegyptian than Greek. Due to pythagorean symbolism of swastika, one can see satanism in Pythagorean Science.

 

 

Give the Money Back!

 

 

 

What is Quantum Physics but the religious language of Industry and Businessmen? Quantum Physics is Everything but a Science.

Two facts as piece of evidence for laymans in the field of Quantum Physics:

- Mathematics are almost on top of Physics now: that's the Tool on top of the object of Science;

- Though Scientists are not supposed to know Economics today, they should have understand that the use of Mathematics in Economy would lead too bankruptcy. Even the boss of a Las Vegas Casino does know that there is no Casino without a boss ruling it. It was an idiotic idea, as idiotic as Master Berkeley is as a Philosopher, a Scientist and a Theologian.

Inglorious Basterds of Quantum Physics got three or four billion euros a few years ago for a stupid Experiment in Switzerland called 'Large Hadron Collider' with no real Scientific Goal, looking for the 'Higgs Boson'. The name of 'Boson' makes me laugh each Time I am listening to it (A French humorist made a fairy tale with the 'Strawberry Gluon' inspired by this Quantum trick.)

Four billion Euros is almost the amount of the Greek debt that fucking bankers and lawyers are asking the Greek people to give back in the coming soon years!

Hypocrisy-Day

 

 

'Woman's Day' in France today. Will this Bourgeois Carnival of Hypocrites never end? There is no advantage that French Women got during these last decades which was not the result of economic capitalist transformation.

Even the franchise for women was decided by the most conservative President of the last sixty years Charles de Gaulle who was thinking that women would be more conservative than men!

Stupid old French feminists are surprised that younger women do not care of their Sexual Feminist fight. Is Selfishness the sole Ideal that a woman can have?

For French philosopher Charles Fourier (1772-1837) who did inspired Karl Marx, prostitution is the back of marriage and marriage is the back of prostitution; and in fact the prostitute and the married women can thank themselves because they are depending on each other. Prostitute woman is able to admit it easily, knowing where her customers are coming; though respectable woman does prefer ignore this truth.

Capitalism change during these last decades, women at work first of all, changed the status of both prostitute and 'respectable woman', abolishing the clear fronteer which was between them before. 'Love-match' is the result of the same transformation, well illustrated by the fantasy of Pretty Slut Julia Roberts, success story that would have make people laugh in XIXth Century because ot its roguish prank.

Abortion Right is due to it too: no Feminism here but Economy. The Law freeing Abortion was even decided in France by the more Rightwing Conservative Party which does partly explain that Catholic Roman Church did not reacted to this Law against children, not more than Lutherian, Jewish and other Churches.

Interesting point here is the confirmation of Marxist History. Fight between Classes is ending says Marx in Europe around 1850 (due to globalization). French Louis-Napoleon Bonaparte was elected by French people who were not belonging to the same class. Economical interests that were before different are more and more common from 1850.

Feminism is an example of a common ideology that is today shared in France by the higher class AND the middle class that is just repeating what it is teached and repeated in newspapers. Feminism is part of a common religion. Young immigrants living in the suburbs are the only not to share this common stupid religion entirely made by Female stupid magazines depending from the Industry and the Banks.

Women are often praising the politics' or the society's benefits against the today evidency of its bankruptcy. But Feminist women are for sure the most devoted women of female gender. See a difference between hysteric Nuns and Feminists women? I do not.