Ok

En poursuivant votre navigation sur ce site, vous acceptez l'utilisation de cookies. Ces derniers assurent le bon fonctionnement de nos services. En savoir plus.

Mon Journal de guerre - Page 80

  • Mistake of A. Huxley

     

    kingkong.jpg

     

     

    Reading "Brave New World" I was very disappointed. Under strong authority of this Shakespeare's word (Bacon is behind), one could expect more than Huxley's wrong Essay.

    Karl Marx is closer to Shakespeare than Huxley does. "Destiny" against "Liberty": it is in fact a good point of view to understand Marx as Big Will. Wether he intended it or not, Marx purified XIXth Century Humanism of its deep coat of archaic pagan ideas (that Nitche, Freud or Levi-Strauss after Marx were not even able to recognize those motherfuckers!).

    What is the mistake of Huxley now: Dictatorship is liberalism, and liberalism is based on Physiocratic idea*. Problem of Huxley was that he was belonging to a Biologist tradition and family, sitting so on this Chair, unable to understand the need of the biologic idea for one Dictatorship (to change the State in a genitrix; though the help of darwinism to nazism or capitalist faith is rather easy to guess.)

    As clearly as possible, I will try to explain the use of the biologic idea:

    - Modern dictatorship is a soul system as music does: soul concept, as much Christian than Pagan or Atheist or Music concept is based on organ (Religious elitist Baroque music of Bach is for instance based on it); old religious pagan trick of soul system that was making anybody a piece of the tribe until the blind sacrifice of his body, liberalism just made it 'modern'. The highest the soul, the lowest the body which is big barrier to Religious or Political power (Understand that Olympic Games are not praising the body but the nations: it is a soul system.)

    - Not only Political institutions but weapons are organs too. Female weakness needs weapons as much as Politics or Sex tool (into which Politics changed men). Biology is the wet compost, the ground where Nature is changed in physiocratic idea or mathematics idea: that is to say politics. Where one can see that Darwin deals more with Politics than Nature is not only in the opposite story of French Pierre Boulle, but in the stupid 'struggle for life' and the statistics on which this idea is based, that are everything but 'natural'. To link the monkey (or any other kind of animal) to human, you need to make both monkey and human mechanics and take them so through the perspective of soul (or language).

    Living with Gorillas: I am not surprised that a Darwinist Woman got this idea. Gorillas are rather good politicians although their struggle for life system is not as efficient as capitalist jungle-law. Therefore Gorilla is the perfect protector husband and father; and of course perfect sexual tool. There is an idea of 'Prince Charming' in the Gorilla, who is nobody else than Lucifer in Christian Tales (Good anarchist French song about the love of Gorillas for the gentlemen of the robe.)

    *Russian dictatorship is not perfect example as United-Kingdom, France or even USA as K. Marx explained, because of its very quick changing from Agriculture to Technical culture. In other words there is no Russian Shakespeare to point out the fiend of Nations like Big Will does for new England ruled by Shylock.

  • Female Terrorism

    New scanners in Airports seem to be made to prove everybody that terrorism is only 1% made by Ben Laden and 99% by Politicians and Newspapers (Same mixing of fear and confidence in the soul metaphor of money. Power including weakness and weakness including power.)

    Even French Advisor of Sarkozy from the Masonic party (Alain Bauer), who must solve various problems of security in France, mostly caused by the incompetence of thirty-six last governments, he admitted that these scanners are idiotic (thinking that they are bad for the business, of course). If I would be paid to observe the stupidity of capitalist economy as this official useless advisor, I would be the richest French guy.

    Nazism before was only 1% made by Hitler and 99% by hi-fi technology on which nazis were based on. I understand this is difficult for a lot of people to admit that nazism principles were as much algebraic than a masonic pyramid.

    I call it 'Female terrorism' because in my opinion this mixing of faith and confidence which one can always find in big dangerous religions devoted to money and power are mostly supported by women -as sex or family does.

    Who is praising the islamic veil first of all on French TV? Islamic women, with exactly the same hysteria than their feminists opponents (far more powerful and part of the French politics). Hysteria that is usefull for politicians and their newspapers, although they are telling us that they are working for our social security. Best social security of Politician forever is Death.

     

     

  • Brave New Gay World

     

    hamelnrattenfanger.jpg

    Watched on French TV, Channel n°1: a kind of ridiculous medecine-woman who is teaching young men (of seventeen!) how to put on condoms before putting on somebodies. SS = Safe Sex after Social Security and Schutz Staffeln.

    This Channel n°1 is made with a bad mixing of commercials, hollywood movies or series and soccer. This is the Channel that low-educated French people are watching but that no French Politician can criticize because he would loose to many voters. Results of liberalism in Europe these last fifty years were not only to make people a little bit less rich than before (who cares?) but to make them the stupidest Euopean people of those last two centuries. 'Highway to Hell' is a good picture because the way to Hell is the widest.

    Argument of this technical lesson about condoms on TV is AIDS prevention of course. Big Brother is not watching you but taking care of you like a good God (Juno the Roman goddess).

    But in fact this very religious and ethical show is made for young boys to become the best CUSTOMERS. With industrial things, the relationship is a sado-masochist relationship too -or sentimental. This is remaining me French painter Delacroix who was from the liberal party at first. He is watching the woman as a beautiful art thing. Now people are just industrial things with no difference of sex. This is the progress of capitalism and feminism.

    Capitalism is of female gender because it is keeping men by the balls. Now capitalism looks like an old paederastic sexual offender who has enough money for legal prostitution. I am rather faithful in his soon murdering by a younger offender than him. Because it is just Natural ethical law to which devils are submitted.

  • Hegel = SS

     

    uri.png

     

     

    Jean-François Copé, le "vautour de Meaux" qui rêve d'être calife à la place du calife, relie pertinement la question de l'identité nationale à la religion existentialiste.

    Mais on ne risque pas de voir J.-F. Copé sur le marché de Meaux expliquer à ses électeurs en quoi consiste l'existentialisme, car de toutes les religions, Marx démontre que l'existentialisme est la plus ésotérique. En matière de religion en effet, qu'importe le vin de messe, pourvu qu'on ait l'ivresse ; "existentialisme" : le mot à lui seul suffit à faire se pâmer les femelles dévotes. Les magiciens qui dévoilent leurs trucs n'ont pas de public. Aux yeux des pharisiens, Jésus est trop explicite : il déchire le voile de la religion et la prive de sa fonction (pas de fonctionnaire sans jargon ésotérique).

    Parmi les docteurs angéliques de la religion existentialiste : la figure d'âne bâté d'Heidegger, membre du parti nazi, afin de mieux rappeler comme la bourgeoisie libérale a su garder du nazisme ce qui lui a paru utile, fustigeant avec d'autant plus de vigueur les moustaches du Führer ; d'ailleurs toute tentative de comprendre l'histoire : clouée au pilori de la censure (Censuré par ex. Drieu La Rochelle qui a reconnu dans le nazisme un capitalisme ordinaire dès 1940 - de ce point de vue, Drieu est plus communiste qu'un syndicaliste qui signe des accords avec un patron gaulliste). Au vrai le principal tort d'Hitler aux yeux des bourgeoise libéraux est d'avoir péché par excès de franchise.

    *

    L'imposture d'Heidegger va jusqu'à changer le matérialisme d'Aristote, savant grec des moins religieux, en culte de la loi et de la mort pour officier de la SS.

    L'"être-soi" selon Hitler ou Goering, étant donné le sacrifice au veau d'or de la nation que leurs suicides représentent (aucune idée de la sorte chez Aristote, pour qui la politique est du domaine de l'anthropologie et donc des matières relatives), cette idéologie rappelle d'autres péripatétismes imbéciles de clercs mélancoliques du moyen âge, raillés par Rabelais sous le nom d'Alcofribas Nasier (homologue de Finkielkraut ou Luc Ferry aujourd'hui) ; l'idéologie nazie rappelle aussi la religion de la "bonne mort" calviniste ou janséniste, le fait une fois encore de grammairiens débiles (La leçon à en tirer, c'est que l'oppression politique a pour effet de transformer la science en grammaire et en mathématiques pythagoriciennes.)

    Blanchis Heidegger et Arendt. Et Céline ou Le Pen ? Pas assez universitaires ! Trop populaires ! Hitler lui-même ne reçut l'appui des cartels allemands que parce qu'il paraissait s'interposer entre le Kapital boche et les Bolcheviks. La peur du Russe, fantasme d'hypocondriaque allemand, prolongée aujourd'hui par BHL et son parti-pris d'alliance avec le Kapital yankee, alors même que la société yankee montre des signes d'hystérie satanique plus nets que la Russie : animisme freudien, goût pédérastique et hypocondriaque pour les armes à feu, convergence du puritanisme et de la pornocratie, substitution du cinéma à l'art et à la science, sidération mathématique et juridique, substitution du culte génétique de la famille au christianisme, enfants-rois martyrisés, livrés à la superstition du Père Noël, du rockn' roll et des vampires...

  • Chant down Sarkozy from Babylon

     

    marleyrevelation.JPG

     

     

    In Africa (Rwanda), French President Sarkozy accused Humanity to have been responsible of millions of African being killed. Sorry but this is liberalism trick one more time. Humanity-my ass! Capitalist system is not 'Humanity'. Auditor is crucial to make fake official history for Dummies to stay in drugs. To put out of the Black Register of Capitalist system all this waves of blood that make an Ocean now:

    - You have to prove that Rwanda politics was not depending on International Capitalist Trafic that makes Capitalist States send soldiers everywhere in the World to secure their business with religious or 'ethical' reasons;

    - You have to prove that Hitler's politics was not a capitalist one to whiten capitalism of millions of murders (what nazis did between 1935 and 1940 is exactly what Obama is dreaming about to do in the US Economics, with probably smallest opportunity to convince bankers to help the middle-class than Hitler had);

    - You have to prove that Abortion laws that made more than six millions of Foetus eliminated (in thirty years only in France) are not capitalist laws without any scientific reason but social, ethical or comfort.

    Out of Africa should go Capitalists professional story-tellers like Sarkozy, not only because of their Pharisaism (as much Christian than Jewish now), but therefore because of the evidency that they drove countries like France or California, 'lands of milk and honey', to bankruptcy. Tale of capitalism is so plain now: wish of milk and honey as a religion (that Hitler did not created only) leads to waves of blood.

  • Winter's Olympic Tale

    Are Olympic Winter Games in Vancouver made for demonstrating that Ecology is the last Capitalist's Stratagem? This spending of a many million dollar capitalist Shop-window, just after a big starvation in some poor countries in Africa or Asia, with the drawback of destroying natural mountains just for idiotic sportsmen fighting for a few seconds: what a clear confession.

    Of Course Chinese younger dictatorship is not stupid enough to nibble at this bait and take Ecology for something else than last Capitalist fancy. That Ecology is part of liberalism can be understood in this declaration of French Al Gore Yann-Artus Bertrand too: 'I am fascinated by gas'. In every kind of liberalism you can be sure to find this fascination. Contrarily to what he wrote in his book 'Mein Kampf', Hitler decided to fight against Russia... because he was fascinated by Russian gas.

    One must tell people from poor countries that are not rich enough to go to the Winter Olympic Games that it could be their best part. Spiritual comfort is in fact probably the more lethal weapon against oneself. Told by Jesus himself. Bet that people living in dreams are alive or dead already?

  • Roma against the Machine?

    French Essayist F. Huguenin recently tried to demonstrate that Pope Benedictus XVIth has nothing to do with liberalism or capitalism contrarily to what his friendly USA-Tour could for instance make the world believe in.

    Problem of Huguenin's theory is that there are many French Catholic who do think today that Capitalism can be mixed with the Gospel; those 'Catholic' people are therefore those who are praising the German Pope as a Pop Star and helped French President Sarkozy to be elected WITHOUT ANY CHRISTIAN ARGUMENT. Closer to female Hysteria are the members of this Papist Party than the Gospel (Wonder why female? Because Capitalism is a big slut.)

    - French Cardinal Barbarin of Lyon, still called 'Prime of Gauls'(!), one of the five main French Roman Catholic chiefs said: 'It is a Christian duty to go to the Poll'. This Satanic advise was never condemned by the Pope. Only capitalists parties helped by big cartels (including weapon industry) do have a chance in France to win the poll, though there do exist other small parties. This is nothing else than straight help of a catholic major Clerk to capitalism AGAINST THE GOSPEL where there is no Encouragement to make Politics but many Warnings against!

    - Hypocrit 'socialism' in which Karl Marx was seeing the sharpest liberalism (and it is in fact sharpest to praise socialism out of China or India today) is the Pope's 'politics' against the evidence of its check and lie along the last two centuries. It is now seven centuries ago that Dante Alighieri condemned corrupted Popes to Hell; five centuries ago that Luther condemned 'market law' and German merchants for the same reason without any results (or very limited). Whom Benedictus XVIth does he think he will convince except a group of French papists female behind him with this new tepid Christian Socialism?

    - Last but not least, Ratzinger's Theology (almost unreadable for common French people contrarily to Moliere's or Shakespeare's theology) is quoting some philosophers who are antichristian like stupid T. Adorno or Horckheimer. Pagan Science, Art or Philosophy have been included from the very beginning by Apostles in their explanations on Holly Scriptures (Saint Paul is praising the Greek people who did believe in a God only); with good or bad results, but those different pagan philosophers and artists: Aristotle, Homer, Plato, Vergil, Cicero, a.s.o., were all believing in God: German philosophy that Ratzinger is quoting is made by State-Suckers; they do trust the sole Golden Calf. All that bullshit is direct consequence of liberalism or capitalism on Roman Carelessness.

  • Marxist be careful!

    Thinking that Hitler and nazism are no ordinary liberalism is the last mistake that marxist people must do. The demonstration that Hitler is one Devil who fell down from the sky is the main argument of publicists, journalists, teachers and the army of liberalism... which mostly do not even believe in God! Everything but History.

    History contrarily teaches that A. Hitler made the most honest liberal politics of XXth century and that this is this honesty that made German nazis adventure shorter, as French Revolution of 1789.

    Antisemitism was just useless for Napoleon before Hitler, who did not even need to seduce French people and win the general election as Hitler did. Antisemitism is just nazi's style, the orchestra of his "Titanic".

  • Muslim against Christian?

    First of all one must say that there is no reason for Catholic or Christian people to choose between Ben Laden and George Bush or Barack Obama. Prohibition of the using of any weapon against anybody except spiritual weapon against the Devil is absolute. There is no Christianism beyond this fronteer but Christian politicians against Jesus clear dissuasion from building his Kingdom in this world (that is French XVIIth theocracy or USA one).

    I am not the best to tell wether Ben Laden is Muslim or not, but Bush and Obama's religion of State and Capital has obviously nothing to do with the Christian Revelation. Not more than Roman laws, maintained in France by the civil massive-murderer Napoleon before Hitler.
    I sometimes ask myself as great Francis Bacon of Verulam if the biggest part of Christian theology was not made to hide the clear message of Jesus? The fact is that in the thirty-six different kind of Catholicism that were invented by scholars, there is more bullshit than pearls.

    *


    With only 10% of immigrants, France is not like USA one immigrant's nation, but due to low ethical values of French capitalist politicians and their medias, those African immigrants are used to scare oldest people and of female gender too (in Eastern of France, mainly) in electoral time, as fear is the basis of political speech since the first days of Humanity (As soon as Moses their leader is not with them, Jewish people are worshiping the Golden Calf, that is nothing else than a metaphor of politics or power.)
    With this kind of speeches and the help of powerful medias, French Industrial cartels are able to make people forget that it changed one of the richest country in the world in a kind of 'Titanic', pointing out the less responsible people to whiten the more responsible with less sense of honour than Jackals have.

    *


    Same number of Christian French people are changing for Muslim religion (which is a Jewish-Christian religion too, not far away from Luther's aborted Reformation) compared to Muslim immigrants who are changing for Christianism. The interesting point is that they both side do mainly change for social reasons not theological. First category are mainly young French guys who want to marry muslim young girls. Other category is mainly muslim young people who want to be more French. But contrarily to what some stupid Christian are trying to make people believe, Jesus is not socialist at all. Contrarily to what stupid communist are trying to make people believe, Karl Marx is not socialist either (Lenin himself knew it). US-religion is more socialist than marxism -and of course Hitler's religion was socialism too. Marx and F. Engels shrewdly saw in 'socialism' the new religious mask of capitalism.

  • Looney Tunes

     

    marvinthemartian.jpg

     

     

    As a result of global dictatorship, a large rate of people in the world is receiving an US-education. I was not watching TV too much when I was young but my first mental impression was although, walking for the first time on the US ground, to walk in a dream (which made me sick because dead can dream as well as they can dance). My second impression was to be in Germany; and in fact, one Nation's soul is nothing else than its money, and dollar is the German 'thaler'.

    Due to Shylock type covenant between France and the USA, French TV-Channels are spreading the US-religion in every French home every night. Some French movies or soap-operas are on TV too, but I am not the stupid French unable to see that French theater is 90% bullshit, made by half-educated French people who have no idea of what cinema does consist in, contrarily to many Us-directors. I am not sure that without the cinema/TV, French politicians would have fucked French people as deeply as they did during those last fifty years: this is the reason why you can be sure that the praise of the cinema 'as the 7th art' is coming from the French bourgeois (still dead).

    Best French movie directors are making commercials; in this category, as crucial as porn, French are maybe better than Us-directors themselves, because of the less puritan laws (I wonder if this advertising for a German car company: 'He has the car, he will get the girl', was French or not?).

    Advantage of these serial stories that we can watch after a while on French-TV is that they do inform people on the US-religion rather well. This is a propaganda of very good quality and Russian or Chinese should take lessons in Hollywood if they want to be the new masters.

    I made thus these summaries out of a few Yankee serial-stories for the kids of my sister who are too young to understand where dreams lead you if you do not fight them:

    - 'Sex in the city': New Whore does prefer Dollar than Sex. She is well educated now (thanks to feminism!).

    - 'The Experts': Praising the dead body is the Civility of Technics and Robots.

    - 'Desperate Housewifes': How USA became a Gay-Nation (and how feathers that were on Sitting-Bull's head first are on French-Cancan dancer Obama's ass now).

    - 'Lost': Revelation is just Entertainment.

    - 'Dr House': Because of its efficiency, one cannot get rid of nazism.

    - '24 H': Everybody is a terrorist but Cops are always the best.

    - 'Numbers': Because he has no phone-call number, Ben Laden is challenging USA-Scientists.

    - 'Prison Break': (No summary: you need to be gay to watch this one as Jail is a Metaphor for Gay-sexuality. French Marquis de Sade was in jail when he wrote his boring praise of politics, violence, torture and sex, and this is partly explaining it. Prison breaks you into a gay jack.)

    - 'Scrubs': ... Just brilliant! I must admit something about this one: if cinema was not 100% religion but art, it would be this 'Scrubs', not that far away from Moliere's message that medical men are possessed by the Devil and his Looney Tunes. When I need to prove someone that USA is one devil's nation, I tell him: 'Just look at the doctors of the Sacred-Heart Hospital in 'Scrubs'. 'Sacred-heart devotion' it is exactly the Christian religion pointed out by Moliere as a satanic come back to primitive superstition.

     

     

     

  • Brave New old World

    The authorship of New secular Christianism is sometimes alloted by Scholars to English Scientist Francis Bacon Verulam (XVIIth).
    No doubt that there is an attempt in Bacon's Theology to make true catholicism, i.e. 'universal' in the Greek understanding of 'catholic'. But was Bacon even as naive as Dante Alighieri about a neutral posture of the State toward Churches? Probably not. Most of Bacon's Theology is about the bad mixing of politics, philosophy, science, ethics and theology that was making the gospels the property of a few clerks at the end of the Renaissance.

    I heard recently Swiss lobbyist Jean Ziegler on French TV giving the advise to last Pope Benedictus XVIth to give up the Catholic clerks' celibacy: is this new Christianism wished by Bacon? No, this is proving that Ziegler, although he is a rather intelligent lobbyist fighting against poor people Slavery organized by International Industry, Z. has no idea about Christianism that he is translating into a dim Socianism (It is therefore funny that Ziegler is quoting stupid German old fashioned philosopher Theodor Adorno as J. Ratzinger himself.)
    US Theocracy with religious leader Obama after Bush does not correspond to Bacon's idea either.


    Close to Bacon is Karl Marx, that is to say opposite to Brave New World in which we are. Scientific Progress in both Marx or Bacon view has nothing to do with Time religion of Einstein or Planck; communist progress cannot be splitted up from individual freedom.
    It took four centuries to capitalists States since Bacon to concentrate the power and the economy for the benefit of a few gangsters under the hypocrite mask of 'liberalism' that can only abuse a few paederastic hypocondriac cow-boys like Clint Eastwood now in Copland-USA.

  • Sucking Poets

    Four years ago US-Writter Johnatan Littell got the major French book prize 'Goncourt' for a book in (a very bad) French ("Les Bienveillantes", 2006). I am the first to recognize that 'style' is the make-up of art, but the funny part of this story was to observe that a Prize which is almost entirely devoted to entertaining and stylate litterature for grand-mothers and christmas gifts was given to this big book on ww2 (It is a current joke in France that no good writter ever got this Goncourt-Prize which has been without exception given to 'writters-that-suck'.) It is not new that the bullshit that enable publishers to live makes author die.

    Due to some Jewish obsession to summarize History into a Jewish problem and so destroy Historical studies*, French press and TV almost coerced French customers to buy Littell's book because of its subject (75% of books are bought in France by women, whose religious attitude is determining the success of a book; every blockbuster must be seen through this prisma. As a man I was bored by long sado-masochist descriptions added to the military life description. Is there any subject more boring in art than sex except soldiers and their military life? Subtle poets know that sex and soldiers are comic subjects about which only secretaries talk about seriously).

    A bizarre shock happened between two main religious today dogmas: Jewish dogma against Gay dogma. As Littell makes his main sadistic nazi anti-heroe a paederastic one, insisting on the incestuous part of his sexuality, the question was: what kind of dogma would be the strongest? Jewish or Gay? I must admit that thanks to Littell I was interested in this Goncourt Prize for the first and probably last time of my life.

    Theory of Littell is in fact not far away from what you can deduce of the reading of the French Marquis de Sade himself, whose devotion to sex cannot be separated from his devotion to politics. Sade is for sure the French philosopher who is the closer to nazi's revolution and Nietszche.

    My idea is rather different from Littell's one and that is the reason why I do think he is just an hypocrite. Sado-masochism is not the consequence of nazism but of liberalism. Karl Marx would no doubt have seen in Hitler's politics a regular liberalism, due to marxist historical method to examinate any kind of politics under its economical machinery first of all.

    French author Pierre Drieu La Rochelle (still censored in France or published with a preface to prevent people to share DLR's opinion!), who was seduced by nazism before the war like Ezra Pound or English Evelyn Waugh were by Mussolini, as soon as they went into Paris, Drieu La Rochelle was disappointed by nazis, recognizing in them ordinary capitalists although he was hoping that Hitler would change liberalism into an honest politics.

    *The most shocking effect of the Jewish obsession about ww2 in France is this idea that Napoleon Ist, because he did not made anything against Jewish, was not a butcher as Hitler, although the cruelty of Napoleon's orders was may be more terrific than nazi's cruelty. No need to say that Napoleon did not have the same opportunity to provoke popular electorate against Jewish like Hitler did.

  • Stop that Winter-Games!

    You must standing against Canadian Olympic Games after Chinese and before English if you do not have racial/cultural prejudices. Wether they take place in Vancouver, Pekin or London, those stupid Games are the shop-window of capitalism and its worldwide slavery.

    First mistake is to think that this kind of competition is praising the body. The 'quarter of glory' (or ten times longer) is what those stupid people who are spending their life running or skiing five hours a day are expecting. Soul system (religion) is what is dividing under the appearance of unity. Destroying the body at the end. Politics, and not only Hitler's, is orchestral manoeuvres in the dark.

    I noticed during my scholarship that sportsmen and mathematician were of the same female gender. Puffed up with pride as a male rod with blood, they are very easy to manipulate by the most cynical Politics. The degree of suffering that those kind of sportmen are able to bear to get their drunkness makes them sado-masochist people and thus potential torturer.

  • Misogyny against War

    One must not be surprised that Marxism is including Misogyny contrarily to Anarchy. It is easy to understand that capitalism is keeping us as women do: by the balls. Not so difficult to understand too that feminism is the roof of sexism, alloting to men the desire of girls! Soldiers are gay-people; I never knew talking about sex except when I was belonging to a French Football Team ('rugby') that I abandonned rather quickly as those guy were boring me to death as much as a Clint Eastwood movie.

    I remember my mother who was shocked when I was fifteen and told her I never would be a soldier in any case to protect the fucking French Nation or Flag or whatever... whatever I, keeping my children soul pure, I still shit on. A mother or a woman (mothers are the worst) who do not even believe in God, is able to believe in the Nation. The more unreal it is, the more a woman believe it. That is why churches and politics are both based on woman faith and so called 'reason' which is including madness (Jackson Pollock's art of controlled hysteria).

  • Black Robe

    Stinking Harvard is not black because of Barack Obama but because of its black robe that makes Obama white.

    Every kind of art, not only Shakespeare's, Michelangelo's, Tintoretto's, every kind of art is fighting for the Revelation or against.

    French caricaturist Honoré Daumier was drawing the lawyer's and the deputies (representing people as they say after christian clerks) in their black clothes as the Priests of Satan's Synagogue with their monkey faces.

    It is because there is too much truth in art that women do prefer Music, as fatal as Sperm.

     

     

    daumierlawyer.jpg

     

     

  • Why Politics kills History

    Pull Politics out off History and you will have Progress. Nazi's or liberal explanation of History is G.W. Hegel's one, that is History explained on the basis of political faith and reason.

    Last step: after having killed the Progress, Politicians and those who suck it will say: Progress does not exist but in Utopia. Nazism is Social Security Progress. Let the State take care of your progress, eat Steven Spielberg soaps whilst.

    I want to take a French example to illustrate why History is nothing less than the Enemy of the State (and of the Church when it was powerful as the State.)

    Georges Bernanos ('France against Robots') is author of this historical sentence written in 1948:

    "There was intelligence with the enemy, but this intelligence was lie.

    There was resistance to the enemy, but this resistance was another lie.

    There was victory, that one did not dare name 'Victory', because of some decency, but 'Liberation'.

    And this 'Liberation' was a lie too, and the biggest one...

    Liars you did not free France, but it is France that, day after day, with the help of Grave-diggers, is freeing itself of you!"

    ('Biggest Fraud in History', January 7th, 1948)

    G. Bernanos was rather well informed about politics and politicians of his time. It is possible not to be agree with this -I do personnally esteem that there is less decency in the word 'Liberation' than in the word 'Victory', but the point is not here. The fact is that in a France where censorship does not officially exist, this sentence cannot be published in newspapers or quoted in TV-shows. Sexual tricky habit of any member of the government is hundred time less dangerous to publish in the mass-medias.

    French -and as proud as Bernanos to be- philosopher Simone Weil who did know de Gaulle and his friends as well as Bernanos, had similar opinion as unpublishable. And it would be wrong to think that recent History is logically more difficult than old one: the case of French Napoleon, as criminal as Hitler was but who is although praised in France by many beotian is there to prove that Politics is dreaming of the destruction of History, piece by piece with the help of movie makers.

    ["Il y a eu des collaborateurs mais la collaboration était un mensonge.

    Il y a eu des résistants, mais la résistance était un autre mensonge.

    Il y a eu la victoire, qu'on n'a tout de même pas osé appeler Victoire, par un reste de pudeur, mais libération.

    Et cette libération était aussi un mensonge, et le plus grand de tous...!

    Menteurs, vous n'avez pas libéré la France, c'est la France qui, avec l'aide du fossoyeur, jour après jour se libère de vous."

    In : 'La plus grande escroquerie de l'Histoire.']

  • Society is the Mass-Murderer

    In most paederastic nations such as Japan, USA or Germany, consequence is that women have more temper than men. Is that the reason why you can walk across a town in the USA during a day without seeing any beautiful girl, which is for a French or an European guy rather confusing?

    Even French Christian Free-Mason* J. de Maistre (1753-1821) must admit it after Ancient Philosophy: politics is of female gender. In general, Jewish or Christian politician try to hide this point because of the link between Eva and the generation plantain tree, the political principle -that one can find in the Greek myth too where Pandora is sex, the sand on which political architecture is grounded.

    Throughout J. de Maistre one can understand that Feminism is not praising Women but Politics behind the religious feminist slogan. In a supposed to be feminist nation like USA, more than 200.000 women from Eastern Europe have been reduced in slavery by porn industry in less than fifteen years; millions of US-women have to pronounce every year -sometimes alone- the death penalty because they are pregnant -for social reasons.

    Social murdering is in fact better accepted by paederastic men and women because they need the State protection as kids need their matrix protection.

    One can notice that there is something too in paederastic or female gender, excited by politics or society, that makes murder easier (Nazism was nothing else than a frank 'Liberalism' and except stupid theory of Darwin, there is nothing new in Nazism compared to classic Liberalism.): soul stand more for women than the body does, contrarily to men who do trust more the body. I never met in fact a 'real man' who was believing that religious theory of S. Freud was something else than female religion.

    In each murderer, especially the one who is the more obviously mad or possessed ('Melancholia' is satanic possession for Christian people as the 'Melancholia' engraving of A. Durer does explain it.) there is a blind mathematician. In other words, the murderer does not see the body but only the mathematical soul. Murder is a social behaviour that remain us that in primitive dictatorship the king was regularly sacrified as a calf, which was may be more human.

    *Atheist masonic principles of XIXth are just derivating from Christian masonic principles of Baroque Time which J. de Maistre was regreting, unable to understand that atheism was the politics' faith and reason (He just should have read the New Testimony!). But there is sincerity in J. de Maistre like in nazism -may be more- and he is usefully seeing both Shakespeare and Francis Bacon as his ennemies.

  • Addiction of the Gay

    In 'GQ quarterly', newspaper magazine for Gay Men* translated in French, I read this interview of French Former Prime Minister Alain Juppé (famous in France for his incredible arrogance). He is admitting in this interview that 'Politics is a drug'. Hey, don't you need to be gay yourself to ignore in 2010 that politics is the strongest drug that killed millions of people quicker than another one? Safer would it be for human gender to prohibit political conversations of addicts in coffee-shops than smocking! (Knowing of course that sex is female and female loves politics and its propaganda entirely made of Ethics, like Eva loves the plantain-tree fruit: I mean that every woman or gay conversation leads to politics like every way leads to Roma.)

    *'Gay Men' are not for me especially 'men who fuck other men' for fun but more metaphysically those who do prefer living in Dreams and Nostalgy than History -and regarding this I must admit US-people are 99% gay in my opinion, but Ezra Pound and Bukowski just trying not to fall in this hole, trying so to give poetry away.

  • My own private Usa

    Living in the USA helped me to understand that Pornography and Ethical Order are the same; i.e. grounded on the same sexual obsession, full of mathematics and mechanics: ground zero (The twin towers, one for the sexual obsession, the other for the moral order which is an Architecture, were in fact rich symbols.)

    I was a Catholic before; I became a Marxist too after (which is necessary when Catholic Pope is German and his corn head full of German dark female philosophy).

    French philosopher Bernard-Henri Levy (BHL), one of the fifty people who do count in Paris and are making the French TV and Press, this guy does think exactly opposite to me. His own experience in the USA when he was 18 (I was a few years older) convinced him that US Literature, Philosophy and Theater are part human social progress (I must underline the fact here that both catholic and marxist people are hating the Society as much as Hitler is loving this Beast that is devouring its sons like Cronos.)

    I wonder if those kind of French friends of the USA like BHL would be able to live in this Nation during a long time?

    Was European Middle Age as religious as USA are? I do doubt about it. And for sure European Middle Age is coming OUT OF Eastern philosophy although USA are the 'Orient Express', next station after German nazism, COMING BACK to Eastern esoteric philosophy.

    A war between China and the USA would be in my opinion a war between two Eastern Culture and would prove one more time that concurrence is the main reason of modern capitalist wars.

    Especially US-Women have this strange typical attitude, not far away from madness, that is named sometimes 'hypochondria'. In a less technical vocabulary this 'hypochondria' can be described as a 'self control' that is typical of animal basic instincts taking care of the environment; to keep here the idea that 'self-control' is political crushing effect that enable a State and its cops to control everybody with efficiency. You cannot cross an animal's gaze, especially when it is not a domestic one; US-women seem to suffer very often from this behaviour (warning condition) governed by fear.

  • Rompre à la Céline

    Je recopie quand même finalement la lettre de Céline que je préfère dans sa correspondance. Lettre de rupture d'avec sa femme Edith, qui devait être une emmerdeuse comme la plupart des femmes bretonnes, ce qui pousse les Bretons qui ne se résignent pas au simulacre du coït entre hommes, vers l'alcoolisme ou un suicide moins lent.

    Moi, la Chine, je la trouve terrible à cause de la Bretagne, où j'ai fait mes études : cas d'évolution extrêmement brutal de la barbarie paysanne vers la barbarie polytechnique et l'enrichissement sans cause ; tout ce qui n'est pas chrétien ni communiste, les Bretons l'adorent : les kermesses, la Fête de l'Huma., l'alcool donc, bien sûr, mais aussi la mer, la religion, les télécommunications, les mathématiques, le cinéma, la République laïque, tous les "gens de robe" en général, les médiats, le journalisme, la sodomie, les défilés militaires, les arbres généalogiques, les blasons, le pognon, l'humour, les jeux de hasard, les contes sataniques... Si je devais plaider au Jugement dernier pour Céline, je dirais : "Mon Dieu, mais Céline est né Breton !"

    Lettre de rupture de Céline, exemplaire de sincérité et de retenue. Moi qui n'ai aucun style et suis prêt à emprunter la moitié de la tunique de n'importe quel écrivain pourvu qu'il ne parle pas un langage ésotérique allemand ou oriental dissimulant son néant intellectuel, je serais bien incapable, hélas, d'écrire une lettre aussi belle :

    "(...) Il faut que tu découvres quelque chose pour te rendre indépendante à Paris. Quant à moi, il m'est impossible de vivre avec quelqu'un - Je ne veux pas te traîner pleurarde et miséreuse derrière moi, tu m'ennuies, voilà tout - ne te raccroche pas à moi. J'aimerais mieux me tuer que de vivre avec toi en continuité - cela sache-le bien et ne m'ennuie plus jamais avec l'attachement, la tendresse - mais bien plutôt arrange ta vie comme tu l'entends. J'ai envie d'être seul, seul, seul, ni dominé, ni en tutelle, ni aimé, libre. Je déteste le mariage, je l'abhorre, je le crache ; il me fait l'impression d'une prison où je crève. (...)" (1926)

    On comprend ici pourquoi Céline domine Proust ou Sartre, Chardonne : que le pédéraste est celui qui ne peut pas vivre en dehors des jupes d'une femme, trop faible pour faire un artiste. Adam n'a pas su dire merde à Eve et il est ainsi tombé sous sa coupe. On imagine mal Michel-Ange ou Shakespeare "mariés". La théorie d'un Shakespeare "marié" me paraît une plaisanterie. Je ne suis pas loin de croire les femmes capables de se consacrer à une cause moins petite qu'elles, les premières à se croire "à l'origine du monde" quand elles n'ont fait qu'engendrer les mondanités, les cas de Simone Weil ou de Jenny Marx, Rosa Luxembourg, exceptionnels. Thérèse de Lisieux ? 1/ Rien n'est plus confortable ni fait pour rassurer qu'un cloître ; 2/ Elle ne parle que de sa papounet et de ses poupées, dont personnellement je n'ai rien à foutre, pas plus que des biscottes de Proust ; 3/ Des sado-masochistes comme Thérèse de Lisieux j'en croise plein quand je traverse le quartier de Pigalle.